Over 100 days into the disappearance of Savannah Guthrie’s mother Nancy Guthrie, the internet is abound with several theories on the case.
The Guthrie family have maintained hope that the family matriarch is still out there, and investigations continue in earnest from the local Pima County Sheriff’s Department as well as the FBI.
While there has been a greater emphasis than before on the use of forensic testing, especially DNA, in the current investigation, a lack of information available to the public has led many sensationalist theories to take precedence, making it harder and harder for the average person following the case to parse through.
Santa Fe-based criminal defense and civil rights attorney John W. Day shared with HELLO! that in his eyes, the only theories worth adding credence to right now are the ones that are the most logical and in-line with what authorities have already shared.
“I believe the most credible theories are still the least sensational ones,” he maintained. “Law enforcement has consistently indicated they believe this was an intentional abduction tied to Nancy Guthrie specifically, rather than a random crime.”
He specifically outlined his belief that per the information that is available, it’s most likely fair to believe that this was an intentional kidnapping, one that would’ve involved someone “familiar” with the 84-year-old Nancy and her family.
“The publicly known facts; the reported surveillance footage, the apparent planning involved, and the ongoing focus on forensic evidence, suggest investigators are looking at someone who may have been familiar with Nancy Guthrie, the family, the property, or the family’s routines,” John explained.
© Getty Images“I don’t buy into the elaborate internet-driven theories that routinely come up in high-profile missing person cases,” he continued. “Those theories often grow because of the information vacuum surrounding an active investigation.”
“The reality is that investigators usually know far more than they can publicly disclose, especially in a potential kidnapping case where preserving the integrity of evidence is critical.”
As for where the current focus on DNA testing goes, John detailed: “The best possible outcome would be a clean DNA link that gives investigators a roadmap to a suspect direction, whether that’s a DNA profile, forensic genealogy lead, or evidence that can definitively place a suspect at the scene.”
© Getty Images“Right now, the case seems to have fragmented forensic evidence, including reportedly mixed DNA samples, which are really difficult to interpret,” he continued.
He further elaborated on what the point of DNA testing is beyond trying to simply identify a suspect. “Ideally, the DNA testing would do two things — narrow the suspect pool and corroborate other investigative evidence such as surveillance footage, timelines, or digital data.”
© Getty Images“In modern cases like this, forensic evidence is about creating a reliable evidentiary roadmap that investigators can build a case around.”
Read the full article here
